Saltar al contenido
PTI LATAMExplorar Portal
Materiales

Abrasion Resistance

The ability of a material to resist progressive removal of surface material through friction, sliding, or erosion — one of the most important practical properties for industrial rubber products. Measured per ASTM D5963 (DIN abrasion test, rotary drum method): a rubber sample is pressed against a rotating drum covered with calibrated abrasive paper; result expressed as volume loss in mm³ (lower = better). Alternative test: ASTM D394 (Pico abrasion). Performance ranking by material type: polyurethane PU (best, 20-50 mm³), natural rubber NR (80-120 mm³), SBR (100-200 mm³), EPDM (150-300 mm³), neoprene CR (150-250 mm³), nitrile NBR (100-250 mm³), silicone VMQ (worst, 200-400+ mm³). For conveyor belt covers, abrasion classes per ISO 14890: H (≤120 mm³), D (≤150 mm³), L (≤200 mm³). Abrasion resistance correlates strongly with tensile strength, resilience, and carbon black loading. Real-world wear depends on particle size, hardness, impact angle, and moisture. PU is 3-10x superior to NR in fine-particle sliding abrasion but NR outperforms in large-particle impact abrasion.

What you need to know

  • The ability of a material to resist progressive removal of surface material through friction, sliding, or erosion — one of the most important practical properties for industrial rubber products.
  • Measured per ASTM D5963 (DIN abrasion test, rotary drum method): a rubber sample is pressed against a rotating drum covered with calibrated abrasive paper; result expressed as volume loss in mm³ (lower = better).
  • Alternative test: ASTM D394 (Pico abrasion).
  • Performance ranking by material type: polyurethane PU (best, 20-50 mm³), natural rubber NR (80-120 mm³), SBR (100-200 mm³), EPDM (150-300 mm³), neoprene CR (150-250 mm³), nitrile NBR (100-250 mm³), silicone VMQ (worst, 200-400+ mm³).
  • For conveyor belt covers, abrasion classes per ISO 14890: H (≤120 mm³), D (≤150 mm³), L (≤200 mm³).

Full definition

Abrasion resistance refers to a material's capability to withstand the gradual removal of surface material due to friction, sliding, or erosion. This property is crucial for industrial rubber products, where wear and tear can significantly impact performance and longevity. The measurement of abrasion resistance is typically conducted using the ASTM D5963 standard, which employs a rotary drum method. In this test, a rubber sample is pressed against a rotating drum that is covered with abrasive paper of known calibration. The result is quantified as the volume loss of the material in mm³, with a lower value indicating better abrasion resistance. An alternative method for evaluating abrasion resistance is ASTM D394, known as the Pico abrasion test, which provides additional insights into the material's durability under different conditions.

Materials are ranked based on their abrasion resistance performance, with polyurethane (PU) typically leading the pack with a volume loss range of 20-50 mm³. This is followed by natural rubber (NR) with 80-120 mm³, styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) at 100-200 mm³, and ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) with a loss of 150-300 mm³. Neoprene (CR) and nitrile (NBR) have comparable values of 150-250 mm³ and 100-250 mm³ respectively, while silicone (VMQ) has the highest volume loss, averaging 200-400+ mm³. For specific applications such as conveyor belt covers, the ISO 14890 standard establishes abrasion classes: H (≤120 mm³), D (≤150 mm³), and L (≤200 mm³), which help in selecting the appropriate material for varying operational environments.

The relationship between abrasion resistance and other material properties is significant. A strong correlation exists between abrasion resistance and tensile strength, resilience, and the amount of carbon black loading. While PU excels in fine-particle sliding abrasion, outperforming NR by 3-10 times, NR demonstrates superior performance in scenarios involving large-particle impact abrasion. Thus, understanding the specific application conditions, including factors such as particle size, hardness, impact angle, and moisture presence, is essential for making informed material choices in industrial settings.

What you need to know

  • What you need to know: - Abrasion resistance is measured using ASTM D5963 and expressed as volume loss in mm³. - Polyurethane (PU) exhibits the best abrasion resistance (20-50 mm³), while silicone (VMQ) shows the worst (200-400+ mm³). - ISO 14890 defines abrasion classes for conveyor belts, aiding in material selection. - Material properties like tensile strength and carbon black loading significantly influence abrasion resistance. - Real-world performance is affected by factors such as particle size, hardness, and moisture.

Industrial applications

  • 1Used in manufacturing rubber components for heavy machinery where friction and wear are prevalent. - Applied in automotive tires where high abrasion resistance is crucial for performance and safety. - Utilized in industrial seals and gaskets that encounter abrasive particles in fluid systems. - Employed in conveyor systems where belt covers must resist wear from transported materials.

Common mistakes

  • Neglecting to consider the specific operating environment when selecting materials can lead to premature wear. - Failing to properly assess the particle size and impact angles can result in suboptimal material performance. - Overlooking the importance of carbon black loading in relation to abrasion resistance.
💡

Pro tip

For applications involving heavy abrasion, consider using polyurethane materials for enhanced durability and lifespan.

Technical standards

  • ASTM D5963 - Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Rubber by the Abrasion Test.
  • ASTM D394 - Standard Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Rubber (Pico Abrasion Test).
  • ISO 14890 - Rubber conveyor belts - Classification.

Suppliers of industrial materials in Mexico

Applicable standards

ASTM D5963ASTM D394ISO 14890: